Over the last fifteen years that I have been surfing web based providers have become more fascist and less supportive of the open exchange of information.
Fascism is based on two fundamental motivators, the desire for control and the fear that information will reduce the ability of the fascist to control others.
China, for example, fears that it's populace will be encouraged to develop ideas of their own and as a result has a rigid censorship program.
Amazon recently deleted purchased content from users Kindle systems.
The Democrats in the United States have consistently claimed to want to help minorities while they systematically destroy urban educational environments. This censorship of education is consistent with their historical political positions supporting slavery, segregation and genocide.
Over the last five years Yahoo has become more and more of a fascist organization and as a result Google has prospered.
Google has always had censorship. While the censorship at Yahoo was less than the censorship at Google Yahoo was useful. Over the last five years Yahoo has embraced fascist censorship.
For over a year I have been trying to delete my Yahoo account. Yahoo refuses to delete my account, probably because I have had it so long and they want to skew their statistics in favor of long term users. By refusing to delete older accounts Yahoo can skew statistical use of their website.
Like all fascism the fascism on the web will eventually fail.
Two thousand years ago Rome began sliding toward elitist fascism. Common people's opinions were ignored, they were supported by the state. Julius Caesar attempted to take Rome back to a time when the common person's opinion mattered and he was murdered by the elitists on the floor of the Roman Senate. The elitists in Rome censored information, twisting it to suit their ideology. The elitists stripped the military preferring to negotiate from a position of political and military weakness. Rome fell as its neighbors learned of its weakness and began doing less and less business.
Eventually the failure to support military action in Vietnam and the failure to respond militarily to the actions of Iran in the late 1970's will become the historical turning point in the fall of the United States and the beginning of a slide into fascism and eventual fall.
The fascism of the web service providers like Google and Yahoo will be major indicators. The fascism of the Obama administration will become the point at which the slide takes a steep downward trend into censorship and fascism.
How many fascists out there think that ?shutting up? people you and your friends disagreed with is just good for everyone. Fascists never think of themselves as fascists.
Even Saddam Hussein thought he was a good person.
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
Sunday, July 19, 2009
Amazon joins the ranks of Fascist Censors
Amazon has determined that they have the right to delete information from electronic devices that they sold to you without your permission.
Throughout time progress has always depended on the open exchange of information. Any kind of progress.
Several thousand years ago people realized this and developed repositories where accumulations of data were stored and accessible.
Because there are a lot of fascists in this world these repositories were often made exclusive institutions where ordinary people were not allowed.
Democracy changed a lot of that. In societies with democratic governments a lot of information was made available to the general population. Not all information, much of the information was still censored by fascist censorship.
Sometimes this fascist censorship comes in the form of academic standing. Sometimes this fascist censorship comes in the form of National Security. Sometimes this fascist censorship comes in the form of greed.
People have a right to earn a living and the infrastructure to distribute information can cost money. This money has to come from somewhere.
Historically copying has been done on a cost vs ability to pay basis. Information was copied, either by hand or using a printing press or a copier and the cost of this copying process was born by the person wanting the copy.
The digital age has created something very different. A situation where copies cost almost nothing, pennies to create and pennies to distribute.
The entire cost of the information is in the development of the information. How much did it cost to develop the information, to edit and publish the information?
The greed of the internet age is creating a situation where people want to continue charging for the duplication and transportation even though these costs have been eliminated.
Because of the disconnect in price, demand and ability to produce there are fascists who are attempting to forcibly control the free market system in an attempt to improve their profits.
Every single time some moron, or morons, attempt to force a market to their will an uncontrolled black market develops.
This is just as true in information as it is with guns or drugs or prostitution.
To eliminate the black market the price of information has to come down to the point where people would rather pay for the information on the open market than on the black market.
Free Markets will always scare the crap out of fascists, greedy fascists or fanatical fascists, freedom always frightens fascists and fascists will always fight to censor those they disagree with, those they fear will convince others of the truth.
You can tell a fascist easily. A fascist will refuse access to information unless you meet their subjective and arbitrary criteria. If you fail to meet the subjective and arbitrary criteria of the fascist, the fascist will censor you.
Just like Amazon censored their customers.
Throughout time progress has always depended on the open exchange of information. Any kind of progress.
Several thousand years ago people realized this and developed repositories where accumulations of data were stored and accessible.
Because there are a lot of fascists in this world these repositories were often made exclusive institutions where ordinary people were not allowed.
Democracy changed a lot of that. In societies with democratic governments a lot of information was made available to the general population. Not all information, much of the information was still censored by fascist censorship.
Sometimes this fascist censorship comes in the form of academic standing. Sometimes this fascist censorship comes in the form of National Security. Sometimes this fascist censorship comes in the form of greed.
People have a right to earn a living and the infrastructure to distribute information can cost money. This money has to come from somewhere.
Historically copying has been done on a cost vs ability to pay basis. Information was copied, either by hand or using a printing press or a copier and the cost of this copying process was born by the person wanting the copy.
The digital age has created something very different. A situation where copies cost almost nothing, pennies to create and pennies to distribute.
The entire cost of the information is in the development of the information. How much did it cost to develop the information, to edit and publish the information?
The greed of the internet age is creating a situation where people want to continue charging for the duplication and transportation even though these costs have been eliminated.
Because of the disconnect in price, demand and ability to produce there are fascists who are attempting to forcibly control the free market system in an attempt to improve their profits.
Every single time some moron, or morons, attempt to force a market to their will an uncontrolled black market develops.
This is just as true in information as it is with guns or drugs or prostitution.
To eliminate the black market the price of information has to come down to the point where people would rather pay for the information on the open market than on the black market.
Free Markets will always scare the crap out of fascists, greedy fascists or fanatical fascists, freedom always frightens fascists and fascists will always fight to censor those they disagree with, those they fear will convince others of the truth.
You can tell a fascist easily. A fascist will refuse access to information unless you meet their subjective and arbitrary criteria. If you fail to meet the subjective and arbitrary criteria of the fascist, the fascist will censor you.
Just like Amazon censored their customers.
Wednesday, July 15, 2009
British Coffins and Politics
The Wall Street Journal has an article worth reading.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124761088935941809.html#mod=whats_news_free?mod=igoogle_wsj_gadgv1
The name of the article is "British Coffins Raise Ire over Afghan Push".
This is a good story about how people in the UK react to the deaths of their soldiers. The soldiers are moved from an airbase, through a town to a coroners office.
People line the streets to grieve the fallen.
This isn't a protest or a photo op for pro or anti war politicians.
It is just people honoring the fallen soldiers.
Don't I wish we could do that in the United States without some scumbag turning it into a political joke.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124761088935941809.html#mod=whats_news_free?mod=igoogle_wsj_gadgv1
The name of the article is "British Coffins Raise Ire over Afghan Push".
This is a good story about how people in the UK react to the deaths of their soldiers. The soldiers are moved from an airbase, through a town to a coroners office.
People line the streets to grieve the fallen.
This isn't a protest or a photo op for pro or anti war politicians.
It is just people honoring the fallen soldiers.
Don't I wish we could do that in the United States without some scumbag turning it into a political joke.
Another Democrat convicted of corruption
On July 14th former State Senator Vincent Fumo (D) was convicted of corruption.
Interestingly very few news articles mention the fact that this corrupt individual who used his position to steal millions is a Democrat.
After being convicted the Democrat had this to say:
"Judge, I never intended to steal. The last thing on my mind was taking money from anybody. I've never done that."
Of course the judge believed him so he only received 5 years in prison for his many years of corruption.
The Pro-Slavery party is the Party of Corruption.
Interestingly very few news articles mention the fact that this corrupt individual who used his position to steal millions is a Democrat.
After being convicted the Democrat had this to say:
"Judge, I never intended to steal. The last thing on my mind was taking money from anybody. I've never done that."
Of course the judge believed him so he only received 5 years in prison for his many years of corruption.
The Pro-Slavery party is the Party of Corruption.
Tuesday, July 14, 2009
Democrats attempt to re-write history, again. (will they ever live in reality?)
Martin Luther King Jr. was a Republican. His father was a Republican.
So why do people believe that Dr. King was a Democrat or supported the Democrats?
In 1964 Barry Goldwater was selected as the Republican candidate for President. Goldwater had started a Planned Parenthood clinic with his wife. Goldwater embraced equal rights for homosexuals. These were issues that Dr. King stood firmly against, especially abortion.
Planned Parenthood and abortion clinics were originally started as Eugenics programs and Dr. King was well aware of this. Barry Goldwater, a long time supporter of equal rights for minorities and women, had not started the Planned Parenthood clinic for racist reasons and Dr. King knew this. Dr. King believed that organizations like Planned Parenthood supported the racist Eugenics agenda.
As a result Dr. King took a stand against Barry Goldwater and his position on Abortion and Gay Rights.
The uneducated masses don't understand these basic issues. The sheep don't understand they support the pro-slavery, pro-segregationist Democrats.
In their minds, as in the minds of pre-WW2 German's, they are supporting what is best for their nation and not some genocidal political party.
There is one big difference.
The NAZI party had not committed a genocide before.
The Democrats have caused at least two genocides in the United States, a genocide of Blacks and a genocide of Native Americans.
The sheep would rather live in a fantasy than face the genocidal truth that they support the pro-slavery political party.
So why do people believe that Dr. King was a Democrat or supported the Democrats?
In 1964 Barry Goldwater was selected as the Republican candidate for President. Goldwater had started a Planned Parenthood clinic with his wife. Goldwater embraced equal rights for homosexuals. These were issues that Dr. King stood firmly against, especially abortion.
Planned Parenthood and abortion clinics were originally started as Eugenics programs and Dr. King was well aware of this. Barry Goldwater, a long time supporter of equal rights for minorities and women, had not started the Planned Parenthood clinic for racist reasons and Dr. King knew this. Dr. King believed that organizations like Planned Parenthood supported the racist Eugenics agenda.
As a result Dr. King took a stand against Barry Goldwater and his position on Abortion and Gay Rights.
The uneducated masses don't understand these basic issues. The sheep don't understand they support the pro-slavery, pro-segregationist Democrats.
In their minds, as in the minds of pre-WW2 German's, they are supporting what is best for their nation and not some genocidal political party.
There is one big difference.
The NAZI party had not committed a genocide before.
The Democrats have caused at least two genocides in the United States, a genocide of Blacks and a genocide of Native Americans.
The sheep would rather live in a fantasy than face the genocidal truth that they support the pro-slavery political party.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
