Democrats have been hiring people to do crazy things for years. One of the most popular old, and well documented, tricks is to hire someone to get caught while defacing your campaign posters.
The vandal admits he was hired to deface the posters and everyone assumes it was someone on the opposite side.
This is the assumption everyone made during Watergate. Nixon tried to cover up the Watergate break in, but, there is still no evidence he had anything to do with the actual break in. Nixon and J Edgar Hover hated each other and there were two FBI agents involved in Watergate. One with the break in and one giving information to a couple of cub reporters.
Scooter Libby is doing time for lying even though there is no evidence Valerie Plame was ever a covert agent.
A woman is cut up during the Obama campaign and is charged with doing it herself.
An abortion activist disrupts a meeting.
I have to wonder about these things.
Sure, it sounds just like a bad Hollywood movie plot.
Who are some of the biggest supporters of the Pro-Slavery party? Those same idiots who think up those crazy Holly movie plots.
Me thinks I smell a rat in so many of these coincidences. Being an engineer I don't believe much in coincidences.
When the nuts thinking up conspiracy plots for dumb movies are supporting a candidate and crazy things that sound like bad movie plots are happening I really have to wonder.....
Monday, July 13, 2009
Sunday, July 12, 2009
Breaking crap! Mysterious CIA program kept hidden!
The Obama administration is politicizing the intelligence services and creating fear in the minds of the sheep following the pro-slavery party.
Supposedly Dick Cheney directed the CIA to keep a program hidden from Congress.
But no one knows what the program is.
Because it is a secret.
But it isn't a secret because everyone knows there is a secret, even though no one knows what the secret is.
The BBC even reported this tripe secret that isn't a secret but no one knows what the secret is.
Leon Panetta blew this whistle so it either is secret or it is not secret.
Former CIA director Michael Hayden tells us there is no secret.
The CIA has more holes in it than a colander. You know what a colander is, it is the thing cooks use to drain pasta after boiling it.
The CIA is torturing people, the CIA isn't torturing people. The CIA is spying on people in the US, the CIA isn't spying on people in the US. There is proof, but there isn't.
For the last six years the CIA has been a political football with more holes in it than a colander.
Some moron writes a report, someone sends a Cheney aide to prison for lying, but, not for releasing the name of a covert CIA operative.
The only thing all this tripe proves to me is that:
US Intelligence gathering is being hampered by politicization of their operations.
The Slave Party is trying to make people fear their own government, just like they had slaves so afraid of the United States that slaves fought for the Confederacy.
Like any con artist the Slave Party is accusing their rivals of doing exactly what they themselves are doing.
The Dems took Congress in 2006, by the end of 2007 we were in a recession. Why? Because stability is important.
President Bush did everything he could to create stability in the United States. The Democrats have done everything to de-stabilize the United States.
The economy is based on political stability people. If you want change you are going to destabilize the economy.
The recession is going to last for years because the slave mongering Democrats are doing everything they can to destabilize politics in the United States with crap like this Mysterious CIA secret program.
When is it time to be afraid?
When the genocidal pro-slavery party is in control and the anti-slavery party is losing ground.
Supposedly Dick Cheney directed the CIA to keep a program hidden from Congress.
But no one knows what the program is.
Because it is a secret.
But it isn't a secret because everyone knows there is a secret, even though no one knows what the secret is.
The BBC even reported this tripe secret that isn't a secret but no one knows what the secret is.
Leon Panetta blew this whistle so it either is secret or it is not secret.
Former CIA director Michael Hayden tells us there is no secret.
The CIA has more holes in it than a colander. You know what a colander is, it is the thing cooks use to drain pasta after boiling it.
The CIA is torturing people, the CIA isn't torturing people. The CIA is spying on people in the US, the CIA isn't spying on people in the US. There is proof, but there isn't.
For the last six years the CIA has been a political football with more holes in it than a colander.
Some moron writes a report, someone sends a Cheney aide to prison for lying, but, not for releasing the name of a covert CIA operative.
The only thing all this tripe proves to me is that:
US Intelligence gathering is being hampered by politicization of their operations.
The Slave Party is trying to make people fear their own government, just like they had slaves so afraid of the United States that slaves fought for the Confederacy.
Like any con artist the Slave Party is accusing their rivals of doing exactly what they themselves are doing.
The Dems took Congress in 2006, by the end of 2007 we were in a recession. Why? Because stability is important.
President Bush did everything he could to create stability in the United States. The Democrats have done everything to de-stabilize the United States.
The economy is based on political stability people. If you want change you are going to destabilize the economy.
The recession is going to last for years because the slave mongering Democrats are doing everything they can to destabilize politics in the United States with crap like this Mysterious CIA secret program.
When is it time to be afraid?
When the genocidal pro-slavery party is in control and the anti-slavery party is losing ground.
Wednesday, July 08, 2009
Cortisol and Phosphatidyl serine
A few weeks ago my doctor told me to start checking my blood sugar and to my surprise it was lowest before I went to bed and actually pretty high in the morning. The last few years my doctor has been after me to do a sleep study and I had already scheduled it when I found out about my strange blood sugar.
About a week before the sleep test I started taking Phosphatidyl serine. I did some research on the web and discovered that when your body over produces cortisol because of physiological stress caused by things like sleep apnea your blood pressure becomes uncontrollable, your blood sugar goes out of wack and you can't loose weight no matter what your diet or how much you exercise. These are three symptoms I have had for the last five years.
I googled "reduce cortisol" and found some really stupid pseudo science and several good articles. One of the dumber articles explained that all cortisol problems were caused by fear. That is total garbage, cortisol is caused by physiological stress which can be caused by things like over excercising. I suppose fear could drive someone to over exercise, but, in my experience desire is the motivator for exercise.
There were some good recommendations for reducing cortisol in the articles. Most of the better articles recommended a dietary supplement called phosphatidyl serine. I purchased a bottle of 60 100mg capsules and tested it. Without changing my diet or increasing my activity level at all I lost 7 pounds in a week. Within three days of taking the phosphatidyl serine my morning blood sugar dropped from 178 in the morning to 138. I have not had a morning blood sugar over 140 and typically it is between 110 and 120. My bedtime blood sugar is typically under 100. Over the last three weeks I have lost a total of 17 pounds going from 295 to 278 this morning.
Cortisol prevents your body from burning accumulated fat. Suppose you eat a light breakfast (500 calories or less), a light lunch (500 calories or less) and a heavier dinner (1000 calories). You are busy during the day so your body burns the calories from breakfast and lunch as it digests them, but, after dinner you are less busy and so your body does not burn all of the calories you ate as you digest them and instead your body converts them to fat.
The cortisol lowers your body?s metabolism to prevent fat burning. Since your body refuses to burn fat and you do not have any calories digesting your body actually begins starving itself. In fact, rather than burn fat your body will burn muscle if your cortisol levels are out of wack. You can eat a 2000 calorie a day diet and burn 2000 calories a day, if you don?t make the calories into multiple smaller meals you will gain weight and burn muscle, bone, etc. Your body will only burn fat as a very last resort IF you starve yourself.
So if your blood pressure begins to become uncontrollable, your blood sugar is lower at night than it is in the morning and you can?t lose weight even when you are following a good diet and/or exercising you should try taking an over the counter cortisol blocker like phosphatidyl serine. Phosphatidyl serine has no known side effects except lightening your wallet.
Dosages: The dosage you take is up to you. Some people take 100mg 3 times a day at meals. I am taking 300mg twice a day, 5am and 5pm. Some people recommend taking phosphatidyl serine right before you go to bed. Dosage recommendations run from 300mg a day to 1200mg a day. I am taking what is called a low therapeutic dose in one of the articles I read.
I will probably increase my dosage to 400mgs three times a day, 5am, 5pm and 10pm when I go to bed, around the end of July provided I am still getting the same results. I will also begin an exercise regime around the same time. Right now I am still in experiment mode. I want to keep things the same for a long enough time to know that I am not suddenly going to bounce back up to 295 again.
Addendum:
I found a new place to buy PS,
http://www.herbs-wholesale.com/PhosphatidylSerine-23926.html
You should constantly check for better prices. This place used to be more expensive. Just watch for labels like "Complex" or "Matrix". Taking 1000 grams of PS might be okay, but, if it is mixed in with 800 grams of other stuff and only 200 grams of PS, that 800 grams of other stuff might end up being bad for you. When you take supplement complexes it can be difficult to pin point the cause of any issues you have. READ LABELS!
Addendum 2:
http://www.swansonvitamins.com/SWU289/ItemDetail
I have not tried this brand yet, but, the price looks good. (I have tried this brand now and in my opinion it is crap. Supplement manufacturers are not held to content standards like drug manufacturers. I took this brand for two months and re-gained some of the weight I had lost taking NOW brand. My diet did not change, my activity level actually increased because my new employer has a great gym! buyer beware!).
Addendum 3:
One of the people commenting has pointed out that high Cortisol levels are often indicators of a tumor attaching itself to the adrenal gland or potential infections which can have a direct influence on the adrenal gland. This is all very true. Infections are typically noticed during normal blood work so doctors probably find these most of the time. Tumors around the adrenal gland are typically called Cushing’s disease. I am not sure that any of these fit me, although in spite of working out I have maintained my weight at 265-270 for a couple of years now. My abdominal muscle pad is now pushing out past my rib cage. It looks like I have a huge pot belly and when I tighten my ab muscles and let people feel they are surprised at how little fat there is.
About a week before the sleep test I started taking Phosphatidyl serine. I did some research on the web and discovered that when your body over produces cortisol because of physiological stress caused by things like sleep apnea your blood pressure becomes uncontrollable, your blood sugar goes out of wack and you can't loose weight no matter what your diet or how much you exercise. These are three symptoms I have had for the last five years.
I googled "reduce cortisol" and found some really stupid pseudo science and several good articles. One of the dumber articles explained that all cortisol problems were caused by fear. That is total garbage, cortisol is caused by physiological stress which can be caused by things like over excercising. I suppose fear could drive someone to over exercise, but, in my experience desire is the motivator for exercise.
There were some good recommendations for reducing cortisol in the articles. Most of the better articles recommended a dietary supplement called phosphatidyl serine. I purchased a bottle of 60 100mg capsules and tested it. Without changing my diet or increasing my activity level at all I lost 7 pounds in a week. Within three days of taking the phosphatidyl serine my morning blood sugar dropped from 178 in the morning to 138. I have not had a morning blood sugar over 140 and typically it is between 110 and 120. My bedtime blood sugar is typically under 100. Over the last three weeks I have lost a total of 17 pounds going from 295 to 278 this morning.
Cortisol prevents your body from burning accumulated fat. Suppose you eat a light breakfast (500 calories or less), a light lunch (500 calories or less) and a heavier dinner (1000 calories). You are busy during the day so your body burns the calories from breakfast and lunch as it digests them, but, after dinner you are less busy and so your body does not burn all of the calories you ate as you digest them and instead your body converts them to fat.
The cortisol lowers your body?s metabolism to prevent fat burning. Since your body refuses to burn fat and you do not have any calories digesting your body actually begins starving itself. In fact, rather than burn fat your body will burn muscle if your cortisol levels are out of wack. You can eat a 2000 calorie a day diet and burn 2000 calories a day, if you don?t make the calories into multiple smaller meals you will gain weight and burn muscle, bone, etc. Your body will only burn fat as a very last resort IF you starve yourself.
So if your blood pressure begins to become uncontrollable, your blood sugar is lower at night than it is in the morning and you can?t lose weight even when you are following a good diet and/or exercising you should try taking an over the counter cortisol blocker like phosphatidyl serine. Phosphatidyl serine has no known side effects except lightening your wallet.
Dosages: The dosage you take is up to you. Some people take 100mg 3 times a day at meals. I am taking 300mg twice a day, 5am and 5pm. Some people recommend taking phosphatidyl serine right before you go to bed. Dosage recommendations run from 300mg a day to 1200mg a day. I am taking what is called a low therapeutic dose in one of the articles I read.
I will probably increase my dosage to 400mgs three times a day, 5am, 5pm and 10pm when I go to bed, around the end of July provided I am still getting the same results. I will also begin an exercise regime around the same time. Right now I am still in experiment mode. I want to keep things the same for a long enough time to know that I am not suddenly going to bounce back up to 295 again.
Addendum:
I found a new place to buy PS,
http://www.herbs-wholesale.com/PhosphatidylSerine-23926.html
You should constantly check for better prices. This place used to be more expensive. Just watch for labels like "Complex" or "Matrix". Taking 1000 grams of PS might be okay, but, if it is mixed in with 800 grams of other stuff and only 200 grams of PS, that 800 grams of other stuff might end up being bad for you. When you take supplement complexes it can be difficult to pin point the cause of any issues you have. READ LABELS!
Addendum 2:
http://www.swansonvitamins.com/SWU289/ItemDetail
I have not tried this brand yet, but, the price looks good. (I have tried this brand now and in my opinion it is crap. Supplement manufacturers are not held to content standards like drug manufacturers. I took this brand for two months and re-gained some of the weight I had lost taking NOW brand. My diet did not change, my activity level actually increased because my new employer has a great gym! buyer beware!).
Addendum 3:
One of the people commenting has pointed out that high Cortisol levels are often indicators of a tumor attaching itself to the adrenal gland or potential infections which can have a direct influence on the adrenal gland. This is all very true. Infections are typically noticed during normal blood work so doctors probably find these most of the time. Tumors around the adrenal gland are typically called Cushing’s disease. I am not sure that any of these fit me, although in spite of working out I have maintained my weight at 265-270 for a couple of years now. My abdominal muscle pad is now pushing out past my rib cage. It looks like I have a huge pot belly and when I tighten my ab muscles and let people feel they are surprised at how little fat there is.
Monday, July 06, 2009
An Obese society and the "fat" tax
Face it, people in societies are sheep.
These idiots think you can outlaw guns and guns will cease to exist in spite of the evidence to the contrary, evidence like Israel under British occupation, evidence like the war on drugs. Where there is a demand there will be a supply. Period.
Morons think SSI is solvent, what a joke.
The truth is most people are just going to do what is easiest for them to do. If we made the world safer people wouldn't want firearms, even nations wouldn't need firearms. If we stopped treating people like crap there would be fewer addicts and the war on drugs would end because people would not need the escape that drugs and alcohol provide.
I believe we need to start taxing high fat, high carbohydrate foods.
There are studies that show meals with 30% protein, 40% carbs and 30% fat are better for people.
Tax foods with more fat than protein.
Tax foods that are all carbs.
Sure, some foods like butter (all fat) or sugar (all carbs) are going to sell and we have to make a provision for that. Basic foods.
Prepared foods, mixes, etc, crap made and advertised by manufacturers needs to be taxed unless the foods have about the same or more protein than fat and don't have more than 125% of carbs compared to protein.
This way people have an easy time buying decent foods.
Suing food makers for advertising a study you don't like is dumb, and a waste of money.
Passing a law that taxes foods that are bad for people is a much better way to do things, and that tax has to paid by the manufacturers.
Sure, they will pass the cost to the consumer and the consumer will stop buying crap so the manufacturer will start putting out foods that have content that is not taxed.
Simple, but because Congress is owned by these big businesses that are stuffing people full of crap it will never happen.
These idiots think you can outlaw guns and guns will cease to exist in spite of the evidence to the contrary, evidence like Israel under British occupation, evidence like the war on drugs. Where there is a demand there will be a supply. Period.
Morons think SSI is solvent, what a joke.
The truth is most people are just going to do what is easiest for them to do. If we made the world safer people wouldn't want firearms, even nations wouldn't need firearms. If we stopped treating people like crap there would be fewer addicts and the war on drugs would end because people would not need the escape that drugs and alcohol provide.
I believe we need to start taxing high fat, high carbohydrate foods.
There are studies that show meals with 30% protein, 40% carbs and 30% fat are better for people.
Tax foods with more fat than protein.
Tax foods that are all carbs.
Sure, some foods like butter (all fat) or sugar (all carbs) are going to sell and we have to make a provision for that. Basic foods.
Prepared foods, mixes, etc, crap made and advertised by manufacturers needs to be taxed unless the foods have about the same or more protein than fat and don't have more than 125% of carbs compared to protein.
This way people have an easy time buying decent foods.
Suing food makers for advertising a study you don't like is dumb, and a waste of money.
Passing a law that taxes foods that are bad for people is a much better way to do things, and that tax has to paid by the manufacturers.
Sure, they will pass the cost to the consumer and the consumer will stop buying crap so the manufacturer will start putting out foods that have content that is not taxed.
Simple, but because Congress is owned by these big businesses that are stuffing people full of crap it will never happen.
Friday, July 03, 2009
How to tell total crap when you read it.
Somethings are really easy to research and prove, the support of slavery by the Democrats in the United States and the resulting racial genocide.
Many of Andrew Jackson's (D) speech's are published on line, his biography is published on line so his history as a slave trader (not just an owner) is well known. It is very simple to research the facts that Andrew Jackson claimed he was too stubborn to allow slavery to end during his presidency, that he used a donkey symbol to emphasize his stubbornness and that the Democrats still use this slavery supporting, genocidal symbol in politics today. Anyone with half a brain can easily research the genocidal history of the Democrats in the United States.
Few do, the sheep just follow their Judas goats to the slaughter.
What about more difficult issues?
I am a big believer in high protein diets. I believe a diet of 50% protein, 25% carbs and 25% fat is best for our nutritional needs.
Can I prove that? Not conclusively.
In 2003 Mary C Gannon wrote a research paper establishing that high protein diets were good for people with diabetes. Her diet had 30% protein, 40% carbs and 30% fat. Do a search on "Mary C Gannon" you will be impressed. The Joslin Diabetes center at Harvard changed their diet recommendations to a high protein diet, 30% protein, 40% carbs, 30% fat after this report was published.
http://diabetes.diabetesjournals.org/content/53/9/2375.full.pdf
This is a well done report. The most important thing in the report is the bibliography. That list of stuff at the end that tells you where the writer got their information.
Here are my rules of thumb for determining crap.
Is there a bibliography?
If yes, review the people and articles the bibliography cites. Wikipedia articles have crap bibliographies most of the time.
Do a search on the paper title and/or author to determine if these papers are peer accepted. If the paper is peer accepted it will be referenced in other papers by other authors.
Now look at this article on an Australian government website.
http://www.betterhealth.vic.gov.au/bhcv2/bhcarticles.nsf/pages/Protein?OpenDocument
No bibliography. No references. A bunch of rules with nothing to back it up. The "anti-high protein" crowd is like this, their Dogma needs no evidence anymore than a genocidal political party needs to prove they represent minorities best.
If you believe crap without researching it and you are defending your beliefs with "that was a long time ago" or "everyone knows that" you are a sheep.
Now here is a reprint of some letters published in a journal.
http://ndt.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/20/3/657
Letters? Yep, look at the bibliography after the letter. Very kewl. Read down to the next page. Read the response. Read the bibliography of the response.
Ahhhh, so the research indicating that high protein diets are dangerous are based on research on the effects of high protein diets where renal problems exist and not in healthy people.
So someone reads a paper where high protein diets increase kidney problems in people with kidney problems and they make the "intuitive" leap that high protein diets suck.
This becomes medical Dogma that Johns Hopkins still spouts without any real supporting evidence.
Anyone hear the sheep baaaing?
Recap.
Unless the research is brain dead simple to preform if there is no bibliography the information is crap.
If the bibliography is crap the information is crap.
If the paper is not being cited by other researchers, or the researcher is not cited the information is crap until it is peer reviewed and accepted.
Dogma like "high protein diets are bad" or "Democrats help the downtrodden" is fodder for sheep and nothing more.
Many of Andrew Jackson's (D) speech's are published on line, his biography is published on line so his history as a slave trader (not just an owner) is well known. It is very simple to research the facts that Andrew Jackson claimed he was too stubborn to allow slavery to end during his presidency, that he used a donkey symbol to emphasize his stubbornness and that the Democrats still use this slavery supporting, genocidal symbol in politics today. Anyone with half a brain can easily research the genocidal history of the Democrats in the United States.
Few do, the sheep just follow their Judas goats to the slaughter.
What about more difficult issues?
I am a big believer in high protein diets. I believe a diet of 50% protein, 25% carbs and 25% fat is best for our nutritional needs.
Can I prove that? Not conclusively.
In 2003 Mary C Gannon wrote a research paper establishing that high protein diets were good for people with diabetes. Her diet had 30% protein, 40% carbs and 30% fat. Do a search on "Mary C Gannon" you will be impressed. The Joslin Diabetes center at Harvard changed their diet recommendations to a high protein diet, 30% protein, 40% carbs, 30% fat after this report was published.
http://diabetes.diabetesjournals.org/content/53/9/2375.full.pdf
This is a well done report. The most important thing in the report is the bibliography. That list of stuff at the end that tells you where the writer got their information.
Here are my rules of thumb for determining crap.
Is there a bibliography?
If yes, review the people and articles the bibliography cites. Wikipedia articles have crap bibliographies most of the time.
Do a search on the paper title and/or author to determine if these papers are peer accepted. If the paper is peer accepted it will be referenced in other papers by other authors.
Now look at this article on an Australian government website.
http://www.betterhealth.vic.gov.au/bhcv2/bhcarticles.nsf/pages/Protein?OpenDocument
No bibliography. No references. A bunch of rules with nothing to back it up. The "anti-high protein" crowd is like this, their Dogma needs no evidence anymore than a genocidal political party needs to prove they represent minorities best.
If you believe crap without researching it and you are defending your beliefs with "that was a long time ago" or "everyone knows that" you are a sheep.
Now here is a reprint of some letters published in a journal.
http://ndt.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/20/3/657
Letters? Yep, look at the bibliography after the letter. Very kewl. Read down to the next page. Read the response. Read the bibliography of the response.
Ahhhh, so the research indicating that high protein diets are dangerous are based on research on the effects of high protein diets where renal problems exist and not in healthy people.
So someone reads a paper where high protein diets increase kidney problems in people with kidney problems and they make the "intuitive" leap that high protein diets suck.
This becomes medical Dogma that Johns Hopkins still spouts without any real supporting evidence.
Anyone hear the sheep baaaing?
Recap.
Unless the research is brain dead simple to preform if there is no bibliography the information is crap.
If the bibliography is crap the information is crap.
If the paper is not being cited by other researchers, or the researcher is not cited the information is crap until it is peer reviewed and accepted.
Dogma like "high protein diets are bad" or "Democrats help the downtrodden" is fodder for sheep and nothing more.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
